Ignorance is Dangerous

Month

July 2012

136 posts

This article. You should read it. → rollingstone.com

apsies:

…[E]mergency food stamps, she was told, are not for imminent emergencies; they’re for emergencies already in progress. You can’t get them if you can make it through the next week – you have to be down to the last few meals you can afford.

“The money’s for my phone, it’s for gas, it’s for my bills,” Adkins said.

“Why are you in a crisis,” the woman asked, “when you have a phone bill?”

“I need the phone so I can get a job. You can’t look for a job without a phone.”

“Why do you have bills?” the woman asked. “I thought you didn’t have a place to live.”

“I live in my van,” Adkins said. “I have insurance.”

“You have a 2007 van,” the woman said. “I think you need to sell that.”

“Please, I need a break,” Adkins said. “I need some help. I need to take a shower.”

“Why didn’t you have a shower?”

“I live in a van.”

The woman told Adkins to come back when she really needed help.

(via sylvysparrow)

If that’s not considered a crisis then it scares me how bad it would really have to get.

Jul 1, 2012516 notes
Thoughts on Death & Taxes

joegressivism:

What I don’t think the rich (and those who support them) truly understand is that we, the 99%, don’t want to punish them for being rich.

We don’t want to take away what they’ve earned, or ultimately change their way of life. Ultimately all we want, at the most basic level, is to die at a comfortable age amongst our family and know that they are taken care of. In my heart of hearts I think that’s all the 1% really want out of life too.

Really that lies at the crux of why universal health care is so damn important. Why we’re fighting so hard to give everyone that simple opportunity (or the best opportunity possible) to die reasonably happy.

Jun 30, 201220 notes
#Just a rant #super rich #the rich #the 1% #the 99% #health care #death and taxes
Jun 30, 20122,700 notes

June 2012

51 posts

Jun 30, 2012125 notes
#obamacare #fact #fiction
Jun 30, 20122,441 notes
Jun 30, 201270,130 notes
Jun 29, 2012166 notes
#News #Politics #Health Care #Supreme Court #SCOTUS
“Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so. The whole thing remains unconstitutional.” —

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)

image

#nope #that’s pretty much what it does

(via agent355)

image

So……….did he skip Civics or……..?

(via kyssthis16)

Someone needs a dictionary.

(via dolphinsuspicious)

This guy is laughably stupid. Like straight up stupid in the most literal definition of the term.

(via thedisgruntledgradstudent)

OMFG.

The stupid; it hurts.

(via tinfoilandtea)

Did he just say the definition of constitutional is not the definition of constitutional? I think he did…

Jun 29, 20122,968 notes
“Before we get too excited about the Supreme Court upholding the Affordable Care Act, let’s consider this: First they upheld the individual mandate (which has no enforceable policy—you can be charged a penalty that you don’t have to pay necessarily.) Second, it struck down the mandate that states have to participate in the Medicaid expansion, which would cover tens of millions more under Medicaid. So if states, and likely most of the Southern states, opt out of expanding Medicaid and face no penalty for doing so, what you now have is the possibility that more poor and working class people are forced into purchasing on the individual market. This is an even bigger win for private insurance companies.” —

Kenyon Farrow

gotta look at all sides of whats going on

(via newwavefeminism)

A more sobering take.

Love,

Rabble

(via rabbleprochoice)

Please not Texas… I need medicaid =/

Jun 29, 2012497 notes
“

Earlier today, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act — the name of the healthcare reform we passed two years ago. In doing so, they’ve re-affirmed a fundamental principle: that here in America, in the wealthiest nation on Earth, no illness or accident should lead to any family’s financial ruin.

…Whatever the politics, today’s decision was a victory for people all over this country whose lives will be more secure because of this law and the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold it.

…First: if you are one of the more than 250 million Americans who already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance — this law will only make it more secure and more affordable. Insurance companies can no longer impose lifetime limits on the amount of care you receive. They can no longer discriminate against children with pre-existing conditions. They can no longer drop your coverage if you get sick. They can no longer jack up your premiums without reason. They are required to provide free preventive care like checkups and mammograms — a provision that’s already helped 54 million Americans with private insurance. And by this August, nearly 13 million of you will recieve a rebate from your insurance company because it spent too much on things like administrative costs and CEO bonuses and not enough on your healthcare.

There’s more: because of the Affordable Care Act, young adults under the age of 26 are able to stay on their parents’ healthcare plans — a provision that’s already helped six million young Americans. And because of the Affordable Care Act, seniors receive a discount on their prescription drugs — a discount that’s already saved more than five million seniors on Medicare about $600 each.

…Now, if you’re one of the 30 million Americans who don’t yet have health insurance, starting in 2014, this law will offer you an array of quality, affordable private health insurance plans to choose from. Each state will take the lead in designing their own menu of options, and if states can come up with even better ways of covering more people at the same quality and cost, this law allows them to do that too.

And I’ve asked Congress to help speed up that process and give states this flexibility in year one. Once states set up these health insurance marketplaces known as ‘exchanges,’ insurance companies will no longer be able to discriminate against any American with a pre-existing health condition. They won’t be able to charge you more just because you’re a woman. They won’t be able to bill you into bankruptcy. If you’re sick, you’ll finally have the same chance to get quality, affordable health care (like) everyone else.

Today the Supreme Court upheld the principle that people who can afford health insurance should take the responsibility to buy health insurance. This is important for two reasons: First, when uninsured people who can afford coverage get sick and show up to the emergency room for care, the rest of us end up paying for their care in the form of higher premiums. And second, if you ask insurance companies to cover people with pre-existing conditions but don’t require people who can afford it to buy their own insurance, some folks might wait until they’re sick to buy the care they need — which would also drive up everybody else’s premiums.

That’s why even though I knew it wouldn’t be politically popular — and resisted the idea when I ran for this office — we ultimately included a provision in the Affordable Care Act that people who can afford to buy health insurance should take the responsibility to do so. In fact, this idea’s enjoyed support from members of both parties — including the current Republican nominee for president.

…It should be pretty clear by now I didn’t do this because it was good politics. I did it because I believed it was good for the country. I did it because I believed it was good for the American people.

…The highest court in the land has now spoken. We will continue to implement this law, and we’ll work together to improve on it where we can. But what we won’t do — what the country can’t afford to do — is re-fight the political battles of two years ago or go back to the way things were.

”
—PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, in an address to the nation regarding the Affordable Care Act (via inothernews)
Jun 29, 2012305 notes
#scotus #aca #healthcare reform #obama #2012
Jun 28, 201223 notes
On another note....

thedailyliberty:

There was a crazy man jerking off in front of my apartment yesterday. He was creeping around and bothering all the girls in my complex all day. Yet I am not allowed to have a gun in my apartment. I had to call the cops, deal with all the BS/all the other girls that got harassed by him, make my friend walk me to campus today, freak out… God forbid I try to defend myself, though.

HOW IS STATISM WORKING FOR US, EH? REALLY WELL, HUH.

So what, you were going to pull a gun on him? Just step out of your apartment and aim a gun at his chest?

I mean, even if you did have a gun, wouldn’t you have just “had to call the cops” anyway? I think the only time the gun would be even slightly appropriate in that situation is if he tried breaking into your apartment.

“All day” So you waited. You saw him harassing the other girls but you didn’t say anything. You just watched? Were you actually waiting to see if he would try and break into your apartment???

You could take self defense classes, empower yourself instead of making friends do favors for you. I mean, if you’re willing to spend money to buy a gun and bullets, and the license and fees, and possibly access to a gun range, why not be willing to learn self defense. That way you aren’t aiming guns at people just because they freaked you out. Pervert or not a bullet in the chest is not the solution to someone who’s “creeping” around.

Jun 28, 201214 notes
#This girl apparently doesn't mind shooting people #she should definitely not have a gun in her appartment. #Mom sneaks in to surprise her #BANG #Whoops #Cat makes weird noise #Poor fluffy
Cantor moves to repeal HCR

tinfoilandtea:

Republicans are responding to the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act by setting a date for its repeal. “The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold ObamaCare is a crushing blow to patients throughout the country,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) said in a statement. “During the week of July 9th, the House will once again repeal ObamaCare, clearing the way for patient-centered reforms that lower costs and increase choice.” Millions of Americans have already benefited from the law, and many more are expected to gain coverage in 2014 and beyond.

Tell Congress that you stand with Obamacare by adding your name HERE.

I signed =]

Jun 28, 201235 notes
#politics #hcr
Jun 28, 2012122 notes
#lol #haha #news #women #politics
DAMN, this healthcare shit is just blowing up my dashboard and feeding my hungry queue.

So I realize I’ve been pretty much just reblogging and only adding my own commentary/reply. Which, to be fair, I warned I would do. However I feel like a bit of a cheat.

So starting tomorrow, each day I will name a country on some form of universal healthcare system, explain the system, the history behind it, statistics and how it’s working out for them, their standard of living, if I can find any complaints, yada yada. Yes, Wikipedia will most likely be a source, if not the main source. I don’t speak that many languages and Wikipedia is better than fiddling with Google translate.

I might forget and skip days. Though it’s doubtful because I have no life. I use politics to feel important.

Let’s think of it as a an at least 34 day challenge. I think I’ll culminate the list with the U.S, even though we won’t technically have it til 2014 I think? I need to do a little more research on that, I think I may be misunderstanding something, feel free to explain it to me!

Jun 28, 2012
#Universal healthcare #Countries #Dumb people who want to move to Canada now #America #Health #care #system
Jun 28, 201228,561 notes
Play
Jun 28, 201219 notes
#obamacare #healthcare #health care #liberal #conservative #democrat #republican #independent #moderate #moderates #independents #politics #libertarian
Don't forget, folks: the Founding Fathers signed a mandate requiring people to buy something. Multiple times. → tnr.com

stfuconservatives:

The founding fathers, it turns out, passed several mandates of their own. In 1790, the very first Congress—which incidentally included 20 framers—passed a law that included a mandate: namely, a requirement that ship owners buy medical insurance for their seamen. This law was then signed by another framer: President George Washington. That’s right, the father of our country had no difficulty imposing a health insurance mandate.

That’s not all. In 1792, a Congress with 17 framers passed another statute that required all able-bodied men to buy firearms. Yes, we used to have not only a right to bear arms, but a federal duty to buy them. Four framers voted against this bill, but the others did not, and it was also signed by Washington. Some tried to repeal this gun purchase mandate on the grounds it was too onerous, but only one framer voted to repeal it.

Six years later, in 1798, Congress addressed the problem that the employer mandate to buy medical insurance for seamen covered drugs and physician services but not hospital stays. And you know what this Congress, with five framers serving in it, did? It enacted a federal law requiring the seamen to buy hospital insurance for themselves. That’s right, Congress enacted an individual mandate requiring the purchase of health insurance. And this act was signed by another founder, President John Adams.

The Founding Fathers supported individual mandates for healthcare and so should you.

Haha and I JUST saw a post that read “the Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves” I guess they’re rolling in laughter? Oorrr hapiness? Or frustration because we’re finally getting it?

Jun 28, 2012629 notes
#Healthcare #obamacare #insurance #founding fathers
Jun 28, 20125,834 notes
Jun 28, 2012321 notes
#unions #income #gap
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 40
  • February 2
  • March
  • April 27
  • May 13
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2012 2013
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June 51
  • July 136
  • August 353
  • September 18
  • October 1
  • November
  • December 33